X hits on this document

PDF document

THE SAVE OUR FORESHORE ORGANISATION IS TOTALLY OPPOSED - page 10 / 12

18 views

0 shares

0 downloads

0 comments

10 / 12

10

Following is an excerpt from Bay Journal Sat Feb 17 2007. Alongside this was a photograph of the plume.

“The mud plume from the dredged waste of the Raby Bay development dumped only a nautical mile off Cleveland Point during construction caused damage to the seagrass beds of the southern Bay. Canal estate owners have been contributing to a fund that offsets the cost of dredging out the canals when they get too shallow. However, the cost has increased sharply for the owners because the EPA has ruled that material has to be shipped to Mud Island to prevent a recurrence of the damage.”

It is these types of issues that are becoming more common which should alert us to problems for the future. A couple of startling differences though which make it more alarming is Shute Harbour is more vulnerable to these problems for a number of reasons: It is more shallow It is more open to the prevailing winds It has a greater fetch It has a more sensitive environment adjacent to the GBRMP

Tourism

  • o

    Gateway no matter how you arrive or pass through the mainland the introduction will be passing a construction site

    • o

      Increasing rents

    • o

      Loss of appeal due to over development (already evidenced)

    • o

      Loss of ability to compete

    • o

      Backpacker price rates are already dropping – there has been a decrease in available beds by 35% due to economic forces yet occupancy rates for remaining business are not increasing

An excerpt from a presentation prepared and delivered by Shutehaven Residents Assn September 2007

Document info
Document views18
Page views18
Page last viewedThu Oct 27 21:14:28 UTC 2016
Pages12
Paragraphs241
Words2773

Comments