X hits on this document

545 views

0 shares

0 downloads

0 comments

106 / 147

450.

As a result of the claims for reimbursement defendants caused to be submitted to

Indiana Medicaid, which were certitled compliant with federal and state Medicaid law and

regulation as a condition of payment by co-conspirator pharmacies, Indiana regularly made

payments to pharmacies for Defendant Manufacturers' illegally switched drugs.

451.

The amounts of the false or fraudulent claims to the State of Indiana were

material.

452.

Plaintiff State of Indiana, being unaware of the falsity of the claims and/or

statements caused to be made by the Defendant Manufacturers, and in reliance on the accuracy

thereof paid and may continue to pay for the Defendant Manufacturers' improperly switched

prescriptions.

All

unlawful

conduct

described

above

may

have

continued

after

Lisitza's

termination with Omnicare.

COUNT XX Conspiracy to Submit False Claims in Violation of the Indiana False Claims and Whistleblower Act Ind. Code §S-1l-S.S-2(b)(7) (Against All Defendants)

  • 453.

    Plaintiffs reallege and incorporate by reference Paragraphs 1-261 set fOlih above.

  • 454.

    By effectuating the PAL letter solicitation-for-kickback scheme detailed herein,

Bristol Myers and Omnicare conspired to defraud the State of Indiana by submitting false claims

and causing the submission of false claims for Monopril, Abilify, and other drugs.

455.

By effectuating a similar PAL letter solicitation-for-kickback scheme, Pfizer and

Omnicare conspired to defraud the State of Indiana by submitting false claims and causing the

submission of false claims for Lipitor, Accupril, and other drugs.

456.

By effectuating a similar PAL letter solicitation-for-kickback scheme, Janssen and

Omnicare conspired to defraud the State of Indiana by submitting false claims and causing the

102

Document info
Document views545
Page views545
Page last viewedThu Dec 08 10:52:55 UTC 2016
Pages147
Paragraphs7751
Words41508

Comments