X hits on this document

36 views

0 shares

0 downloads

0 comments

9 / 10

Case 1:10-cv-00061-GHD-JAD

Document 22

Filed 03/19/2010

Page 9 of 10

a prom.3

Plaintiff has thus failed to show that any constitutional violation by the Defendant subjected

her to irreparable injury, and has failed to establish a probability of prevailing on the merits. Further,

Plaintiff has failed to carry her burden of persuasion by making a clear showing that any alleged

threatened injuryto Plaintiff, if the preliminaryinjunction is denied, far outweighs the potential harm

to Defendant if injunctive relief ensues. Finally, Plaintiff has failed to carry her burden of persuasion

by making a clear showing that the issuance of a preliminary injunction at this stage of the

proceedings will not disserve the public interest. Issuance of a preliminary injunction would not be

in harmony with the greater public interest of enabling the Defendant to exercise its judgment to

provide essential governance and direction for the public education of students, including Plaintiff.

There being no adequate showing of a genuine entitlement to the equitable powers of this

Court, Defendant respectfully submits that Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction should be

denied.

NOW, THEREFORE, Defendants pray that upon a hearing hereof, Plaintiff’s Motion for

a Preliminary Injunction should be denied.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this the 19th day of March, 2010.

GRIFFITH & GRIFFITH

By:

Ben Griffith Benjamin E. Griffith, MSB #5026

3See generally Palmer v. Thompson, 403 U.S. 17, 225 (1971)(Black, J.). (“[T]here is an element of futility to invalidate a law because of the bad motives of its supporters. If the law is struck down for this reason, rather than because of its facial content or effect, it would presumably be valid as soon as the ... relevant governing body repassed it for different reasons.”).

9

Document info
Document views36
Page views36
Page last viewedSun Jan 22 10:32:17 UTC 2017
Pages10
Paragraphs286
Words3095

Comments