X hits on this document

Word document

06-29-10%20Board%20Meeting%20Transcript%20(C).doc - page 228 / 276

1002 views

0 shares

0 downloads

0 comments

228 / 276

June 29, 2010

OR 15 TEACHERS, IT WOULD END UP CLOSE TO A MILLION DOLLARS.

SUP. MOLINA: WHAT IF THEY CAME BACK ONLY AS SUBSTITUTES?

DR. DARLENE ROBLES: I ASKED THAT QUESTION. IT'S THE SAME THING. THEY WOULD ALSO BE CONSIDERED TO BE OWNED BY THE COUNTY OFFICE.

SUP. MOLINA, CHAIR: WHY?

DR. DARLENE ROBLES: THAT'S THE WAY THE ED CODE READS. WE EVEN ASKED, "WELL, WHAT IF THEY SIGNED TO THAT EFFECT, THAT THEY'RE WILLING DOING INTO A TEMPORARY CONTRACT?"

SUP. MOLINA, CHAIR: IS THIS THE COUNTY COUNSEL?

DR. DARLENE ROBLES: NO. THAT'S OUR LEGAL COUNSEL THAT WORKS ON THE REDUCTION FORCE BECAUSE IT'S A VERY COMPLICATED SYSTEM IN THE ED CODE ABOUT WHEN TEACHERS ARE NOTIFIED--

SUP. MOLINA, CHAIR: I UNDERSTAND, BUT THE POINT IS THAT IF YOU CREATE A SEPARATE CONTRACT WITH AN INDIVIDUAL, SHOULDN'T THAT CONTRACT GOVERN?

DR. DARLENE ROBLES: THIS IS WHAT HE STATES, THAT IN ESSENCE--

4

Document info
Document views1002
Page views1002
Page last viewedThu Dec 08 22:34:21 UTC 2016
Pages276
Paragraphs1618
Words59423

Comments