X hits on this document

Word document

06-29-10%20Board%20Meeting%20Transcript%20(C).doc - page 254 / 276

899 views

0 shares

0 downloads

0 comments

254 / 276

June 29, 2010

MY NUMEROUS WRITTEN DISPUTES AND REQUESTS FOR INSPECTION OF MEDICAL RECORDS, L.A.C.+U.S.C. REFERRED MY ACCOUNT TO A THIRD PARTY COLLECTION AGENCY. PARTIAL RESOLUTION OF THE MATTER OCCURRED WHEN I WENT TO THE FACILITY IN PERSON AND AFTER SPEAKING WITH NO LESS THAN 10 EMPLOYEES OVER A COURSE OF FOUR HOURS, I OBTAINED A WRITTEN RECORD OF MY VISIT. IN THAT DOCUMENT IT STATES THAT NO EXTRACTION WAS PERFORMED. HOWEVER, L.A.C.+U.S.C. HAD PREVIOUSLY SENT ME A BILL FOR $500 ATTACHED TO WHICH WAS A LETTER FROM THE BILLING INQUIRY UNIT STATING THAT DENTAL AND ORAL SURGERY BILLING CODE 6634 WAS PERFORMED.

SUP. MOLINA, CHAIR: MR. FOGEL, DO YOU WANT TO SUMMARIZE YOUR REMARKS, PLEASE?

JEFF FOGEL: I CAN TRY. THE PEOPLE OF L.A. COUNTY WATCHING THIS BOARD WILL BE JUDGED BY HOW IT RESPONDS. THAT'S THE OBLIGATORY--

SUP. MOLINA, CHAIR: ALL RIGHT. AGAIN, PLEASE UNDERSTAND, WE'RE TRYING TO WORK WITH YOU, BUT YOU WERE SEEN BY A MEDICAL DOCTOR. WE DON'T CHARGE BY THE MINUTE, WE CHARGE BY THE VISIT.

JEFF FOGEL: I UNDERSTAND. THAT'S KIND OF EXCESSIVE.

4

Document info
Document views899
Page views899
Page last viewedSun Dec 04 23:42:39 UTC 2016
Pages276
Paragraphs1618
Words59423

Comments