X hits on this document

Word document

06-29-10%20Board%20Meeting%20Transcript%20(C).doc - page 32 / 276

1029 views

0 shares

0 downloads

0 comments

32 / 276

June 29, 2010

THE AUDITOR-CONTROLLER IS ASKING A SERIES OF QUESTIONS FROM EVERYTHING FROM EMPLOYEE'S NAME, AND WORK SITE, THE SUPERVISOR'S NAME AND WORK SITE AS WELL AS ISSUES OF FREQUENCY OF TELECOMMUTING AND ASKING FOR A SIGNATURE AND ASKING THE EMPLOYEE FOR A WORK PHONE NUMBER. I THINK THESE ARE ALL WITHIN THE SCOPE OF OUR RESPONSIBILITY AS THE EMPLOYER FOR THE EMPLOYEES AND SO-- AND HOPEFULLY WE'RE GOING TO GET TO A REAL TRUE AUDIT OF ALL OF OUR EMPLOYEES AND WHERE THEY'RE AT AND SO ON. IT'S A SHAME THAT WE'VE HAD TO GO THIS ROUTE, BUT AT THE SAME TIME, IT IS MY UNDERSTANDING THAT LOS ANGELES COUNTY PROBATION OFFICERS' UNION HAS SENT OUT AN EMAIL OR SOME KIND OF AN OFFICIAL LETTER, IT IS SIGNED BY RALPH MILLER AS PRESIDENT, ASKING THEM THAT-- TELLING THEM THAT THEY'RE ONLY REQUIRED TO ANSWER THE QUESTIONS WITH REGARD TO-- WHAT IS THIS-- YOUR WORK SITE AND YOUR IDENTITY AND THAT'S IT, AND THAT THEY SHOULD DECLINE TO ANSWER ANY OTHER QUESTIONS, AND I JUST WANT TO UNDERSTAND THAT AS THE EMPLOYER, WOULDN'T WE CONSIDER THIS INSUBORDINATION?

CAL REMINGTON: IF I MAY, MADAME SUPERVISOR -- OR MADAME CHAIR, I THINK IT WAS REALLY A MISCOMMUNICATION THAT STARTED WITH THE DEPARTMENT AND --

SUP. MOLINA, CHAIR: MISCOMMUNICATION IN WHAT SENSE?

4

Document info
Document views1029
Page views1029
Page last viewedSat Dec 10 02:27:21 UTC 2016
Pages276
Paragraphs1618
Words59423

Comments