X hits on this document

20 views

0 shares

0 downloads

0 comments

2 / 10

individually and on behalf of similarly situated African-American workers of defendant

Merck-Medco, claiming racial discrimination in employment.

On June 18, 2001, in response to the defendants’ first motion to dismiss, the late

Honorable Charles R. Weiner ordered the parties to conduct discovery on the issue of

whether Thompson was an employee of Merck.3 Neither party initiated any such

discovery. On December 30, 2002, Judge Weiner dismissed the case without prejudice.

Nevertheless, the case was reopened a few months later when the defendants filed a

motion to strike all class allegations which Judge Weiner granted.

On May 25, 2004, the parties entered into a Stipulation in the Webb case wherein

the parties and the Court agreed that discovery and trial would take place on a priority

basis in the cases of plaintiffs Shannon Feddiman-Simon, Anthony Green, and Roger

Moore.4 According to Thompson, these cases were prioritized as “bellwether” actions

which were expected to provide information and perhaps settlement values in related

litigation, including Thompson’s claims. Following the death of Judge Weiner, this case

was reassigned to me.

In March 2006, plaintiff’s counsel repeatedly attempted to contact Thompson to

inquire whether she wanted to continue with the case and whether she wanted to request

3 On April 23, 2001, defendant Merck filed a motion to dismiss, claiming it was not a proper defendant in this case because it was not Thompson’s employer.

4 I note that this stipulation did not include an agreement that the claims of the other plaintiffs would be abandoned or suspended pending the prioritized discovery and trial of these three plaintiffs. See Exhibit B of Pl’s motion to reopen the case.

2

Document info
Document views20
Page views20
Page last viewedMon Dec 05 11:18:01 UTC 2016
Pages10
Paragraphs178
Words2011

Comments