X hits on this document

106 views

0 shares

0 downloads

0 comments

11 / 45

City of North Las Vegas Page 11

Planning Commission Minutes December 28, 2005

4.

UN-132-05 (23580) MAGICAL TOTS ACADEMY (PUBLIC HEARING).

AN

APPLICATION SUBMITTED PROPERTY OWNER, FOR A

BY USE

OFFICES AT ALIANTE COMMONS, LLC, PERMIT IN A C-P PROFESSIONAL OFFICE

COMMERCIAL DISTRICT TO ALLOW A CHILD CARE FACILITY. PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF ANN ROAD

THE AND

WILLIS

STREET.

THE

ASSESSOR S

PARCEL

NUMBER

IS

124-30-802-021.

The application was presented by Robert Eastman, Principal Planner on behalf of Staff who indicated Staff was recommending approval of UN-132-05 subject to the following conditions:

  • 1.

    That, unless expressly authorized through a variance, waiver or another approved method, the use shall comply with all applicable codes and ordinances.

  • 2.

    That the applicant must comply with the conditions of approval for Ordinance 2148 (The Aliante Commons Development Agreement).

3.

The development shall comply with the Commercial Development Standards and Design Guidelines.

  • 4.

    The use permit is site specific and non-transferrable.

  • 5.

    The applicant shall submit a traffic study update for review and approval.

Frank Grant, 3230 South Buffalo, Las Vegas, NV 89117 appeared on behalf of the applicant asking for a continuance to January 11, 2006. When the application for the day care facility was submitted, Staff was not aware of the Development Agreement. The Agreement has a provision that the following special uses shall not require the approval of a special use permit within the commercial portion of the subject property:

  • a.

    With bank and financial institutions

  • b.

    with child care facilities

Unfortunately, information regarding the Development Agreement was sent to the Planner, but they were not in the office, so the applicant wanted to give Staff time to review the Agreement.

Mr. Eastman agreed with the applicant that a continuance was warranted, since they did not have a copy of the Development Agreement and it would give Staff time to review it. If the applicant was correct, the application could be withdrawn.

Document info
Document views106
Page views106
Page last viewedSun Dec 04 10:55:52 UTC 2016
Pages45
Paragraphs1080
Words12019

Comments