Office of Systems Integration
Evaluation and Selection Plan
combined by weighting the references as shown below, depending on the number of subcontractor companies proposed by the prime.
(Prime Bidder’s Score * weight) + (subcontractor score * weight) = Final Reference Check Score
Table 3. Subcontractor Reference Check Weighting
# of Subcontractors
Proposals may earn up to xxx points for their responses to the requirements of the RFP. The points allocated to the various areas are shown in the table below, along with the RFP reference.
Table 4. Summary of Scorable Areas
Statement of Work Requirements
Project Management Requirements
Staffing/Staff Resumes Requirements
Project Management Plan Requirements
Reference Check Requirements
The point definitions used in the scoring worksheets are as follows.
Table 5. Point Scoring Definitions
The proposal response does not address the requirement or the response does not describe experience related to this requirement.
The proposal response minimally addresses the requirement, but one or more major components or considerations for this requirement are not addressed. There is a low degree of confidence in the bidder’s response or proposed solution.
The proposal response addresses the requirement adequately, but minor considerations are not addressed. There is an acceptable degree of confidence in the bidder’s response or proposed solution.
The proposal response fully addresses the requirement and provides a good quality solution. There is a good degree of confidence in the bidder’s response or proposed solution.
The proposal response addresses all considerations of this requirement and includes innovative or cost-saving approaches. There is a high degree of confidence in the bidder’s response or
< DB Name > Evaluation and Selection Plan Template fv1.DOC