X hits on this document

25 views

0 shares

0 downloads

0 comments

8 / 9

8

© 2009 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.

Comparison with Other Alternatives

344

6.1

1.9

80

IGCC  with CO2 Capture

860

6.4

0.5

80

NGCC  @ $7/MM BTU

860

4.8

0.5

80

NGCC  @ $5/MM BTU

1,760

4.2

1.3

80

Coal PC USC)

None

18

3.3

33

Solar Thermal Trough

None

4.7 - 6.5

1.2 – 1.6

30 -  42

Wind (class 3- 6)

None

None

15  - 25

4.2 – 6

3 - 5

0.8 – 1.3

38

38

Wave (Oregon – 1st 100 MW

10,000 – 10,100 MW plant

CO2 (lbs per MWh)

COE[2] (cents/ kWh)

Capital Cost [1] ($/MW)

Capacity Factor (%)

All costs in 2005 Constant US$ with 2005 without financial Incentives

GE 7 F machine or equivalent

600 MW PC Plant, Pittsburgh #8 Coal

IGCC with 80% removal

Document info
Document views25
Page views25
Page last viewedWed Dec 07 13:17:55 UTC 2016
Pages9
Paragraphs172
Words677

Comments