X hits on this document

Word document

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION - page 2 / 43

105 views

0 shares

0 downloads

0 comments

2 / 43

Plaintiff, the District Attorney of Yolo County, initiated this action against the Broderick Boys, an alleged criminal street gang, and 23 of its members to enjoin as a public nuisance their activities in a 2.98-square-mile area of the City of West Sacramento.  The trial court granted plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction and defendants appeal.  We conclude sufficient, credible evidence supports the trial court’s conclusion the Broderick Boys is a criminal street gang whose activities have created a public nuisance in the designated area.  However, we further conclude two provisions of the preliminary injunction, one dealing with controlled substances and the other dealing with the consumption of alcoholic beverages, are unenforceable.  We therefore reverse as to those provisions but otherwise affirm the order.  

Facts and Proceedings

Plaintiff filed the original complaint in this action on December 30, 2004, against the Broderick Boys and Does 1 through 400 and obtained a preliminary injunction by default.  Later, plaintiff dismissed the Doe defendants and obtained a permanent injunction against the Broderick Boys alone, also by default.  Several individuals moved to set aside the judgment, but the trial court denied the motion.  On appeal to this court, we concluded plaintiff failed to provide adequate notice of the action and reversed the order denying the motion to set aside the default judgment.  (See People ex rel. Reisig v. The Broderick Boys (2007) 149 Cal.App.4th 1506, 1512-1516, 1528-

2

Document info
Document views105
Page views105
Page last viewedSat Dec 10 02:44:10 UTC 2016
Pages43
Paragraphs202
Words10151

Comments