X hits on this document

Word document

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION - page 38 / 43

77 views

0 shares

0 downloads

0 comments

38 / 43

asked:  “If a gang member is traveling ‘outside’ for the purpose of visiting nongang family members or friends who live in the Safety Zone, is he or she going to a ‘meeting’ within the meaning of the exception to the curfew provision?  The broad dictionary definition of ‘meeting’ could encompass such an informal social gathering.  Or does ‘meeting’ apply only to a formally organized gathering, such as a meeting at a church, school, or community center?”  (Ibid.)  The court also found the term “entertainment activity” vague.  According to the court, “entertainment” “could encompass practically any lawful activity that provides diversion or amusement, such as a walk in the park.”  (Ibid.)  The court further questioned:  “Does ‘entertainment activity’ apply only to activities occurring at places of entertainment open to the public, such as restaurants, theaters, and nightclubs?  If a gang member is going to a party at someone’s home in the Safety Zone, is he or she going to an ‘entertainment activity’ within the meaning of the exception to the curfew provision?  Is he or she going to an ‘entertainment activity’ if visiting a friend’s house in the Safety Zone to watch a DVD movie on a big screen television?”  (Ibid.)  

The curfew provision at issue here does not suffer from the foregoing ambiguities.  It bars gang members from any “public property, a public place, on the premises of any establishment, or on a vacant lot” during curfew hours.  Public place is defined as “any place to which the public has access, including but not limited to sidewalks, alleys, streets, highways, parks,

38

Document info
Document views77
Page views77
Page last viewedSat Dec 03 16:28:22 UTC 2016
Pages43
Paragraphs202
Words10151

Comments