X hits on this document

Word document

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION - page 5 / 43

96 views

0 shares

0 downloads

0 comments

5 / 43

did not believe there was a gang problem requiring an injunction.  Two declarants indicated they have not seen any groups of gang members patrolling the streets in the Safety Zone, and others expressed the belief that the only ones engaging in harassment in the area are the police.  

Defendants also submitted the declaration of their own gang expert, Professor James Hernandez of California State University, Sacramento, who opined the name “Broderick Boys” does not identify a criminal street gang.  Rather, it is a designation used by some people to indicate their geographic home, i.e., the Broderick area of West Sacramento.  According to Professor Hernandez, there is no leadership structure, defined goals, or organized efforts by the purported members of the Broderick Boys, as would be expected in a criminal street gang.  Professor Hernandez further indicated the crime rate in West Sacramento is no greater than in any other city of its size and demographics.  

The trial court issued the preliminary injunction.  In its order granting plaintiff’s motion, the court indicated that plaintiff met his burden of proving he is likely to prevail on the merits of his public nuisance claim and that any harm caused by continuation of the nuisance is not outweighed by the effects on defendants of granting the temporary injunction.  In particular, the court found:  “[T]he Broderick Boys, through its members including the defendants named in the amended preliminary injunction, acting individually or collectively, have engaged in violent assaults; robberies; ‘tagging’ of

5

Document info
Document views96
Page views96
Page last viewedThu Dec 08 06:47:15 UTC 2016
Pages43
Paragraphs202
Words10151

Comments