X hits on this document

Word document

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION - page 9 / 43

89 views

0 shares

0 downloads

0 comments

9 / 43

(1998) 18 Cal.4th 1079 and In re Angelia P. (1981) 28 Cal.3d 908.  In those cases, the state high court indicated the applicable standard is something less than proof beyond a reasonable doubt.  It is satisfied where the evidence establishes a “high probability” of the requisite findings.  (Broadman, supra, 18 Cal.4th at p. 1090; see also In re Angelia P., supra, 28 Cal.3d at p. 919.)  Thus, our task is to determine if the trial court abused its discretion in concluding the evidence established a high probability (1) plaintiff will prevail on the merits, and (2) the interim harm plaintiff is likely to sustain if the preliminary injunction is denied is not exceeded by the interim harm defendants are likely to suffer if the injunction is issued.  

II

Criminal Street Gang

Defendants contend plaintiff failed to prove there is a criminal street gang named the Broderick Boys operating in West Sacramento.  They argue plaintiff relied on general police declarations regarding gang customs and clothing and self-identification by alleged gang members without ever proving a gang exists in the first place.  They further argue plaintiff failed to present any evidence to establish “how many members were in the purported gang, what the bylaws of the gang were, identification of individuals describing their rank or position, no evidence of collaborative activities or collective organizational structure.”  According to defendants, plaintiff

9

Document info
Document views89
Page views89
Page last viewedTue Dec 06 20:27:58 UTC 2016
Pages43
Paragraphs202
Words10151

Comments