X hits on this document

PDF document

DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln - page 73 / 152

369 views

0 shares

0 downloads

0 comments

73 / 152

71

Entertainment

Participants found their use of these technologies as pleasurable activities that

entertained them. Learning no longer was dull and boring to them. Participant 23

announced that Web 2.0 technology is: ―… entertaining, interesting, attention grabbing,

and most importantly a great contact source.‖ (P23) When learning is entertaining it is

also motivating to learn. ―It (Web 2.0) makes me want to take part in the activity.‖ (P18)

was how a participant felt about their use of Web 2.0 tools in language learning.

Another participant said: ―Seeing and hearing are better than just reading, it gives

the subject more life.‖ (P3) For many participants like this one the content came to life

by using these tools. Another participant agreed that it entertained but also was a helpful

resources to them. ―I found many interesting resources that help me.‖ (P9).

Negative Case

There is always another side of the argument and this brings validity and

generalizability to the findings. One participant complained that, ―I don‘t see the point in

forcing students to use technology that not everyone has or intends to ever use outside of

class.‖ (P2) This can be true for some students but the majority of students today will use

these and many more advanced technology tools.

Theme 5. “Easy to Use.”: Ease.

Easy to Use

Most participants felt that the Web 2.0 technologies were easy to use. One

participant summarized his/her use of Web 2.0 technologies as follows: ―Enhanced it.

Document info
Document views369
Page views369
Page last viewedThu Dec 08 12:41:41 UTC 2016
Pages152
Paragraphs4746
Words30506

Comments