X hits on this document

141 views

0 shares

0 downloads

0 comments

43 / 54

References

Abramczyk, J.E., Cincilla, J.A., Honaker, J.D., 2003. Going-private “dilemma”? -- not in

Delaware. Business Lawyer 58, 1351-1371.

Allen, W.T., Jacobs, J.B., Strine, L.E., 2001. Function over form: a reassessment of standards

of review in Delaware corporate law. Business Lawyer 56, 1287-1321.

Aronstam,

B.R.,

Balotti,

R.F.,

Rehbock,

T.,

2003.

Delaware’s

going

private

dilemma:

fostering protections for minority shareholders in the wake of Siliconix and Unocal Exploration.

Business Lawyer 58, 519-558.

Aronstam, B.R., Balotti, R.F., Rehbock, T., 2004.

Revisiting Delaware’s going private

dilemma post-Pure. Business Lawyer 59, 1459-1481.

Bates, T.W., Lemmon, M.L., Linck, J.S., 2004. Shareholder welfare and bid negotiation in

freeze-out deals: are minority shareholders left out in the cold? Working paper.

Bebchuk, L., Cohen, A., 2003. Firms’ decisions where to incorporate. Journal of Law &

Economics 46, 383-425.

Booth, R.A., 2001. Minority discounts and control premiums in appraisal proceedings.

Business Lawyer 57, 127-61.

Bruck, C., 1989. The predators ball: the inside story of Drexel Burnham and the rise of the

junk bond raiders.

Brudney, V., Chirelstein, M.A., 1978. A restatement of corporate freezeouts. Yale Law

Journal 87, 1354-76.

41

Document info
Document views141
Page views141
Page last viewedFri Dec 09 10:09:39 UTC 2016
Pages54
Paragraphs1765
Words17237

Comments