X hits on this document

PDF document

Results From the 2007–08 Schools and Staffing Survey - page 33 / 59

127 views

0 shares

0 downloads

0 comments

33 / 59

A-6

Table A-5. Table A-5.

Standard errors for Table 5: Percentage of public school districts that used pay incentives for various reasons, by selected public school district characteristics: 2007-08

To reward teachers who have attained National Board for

To recruit or retain

To recruit or retain

Professional Teaching Standards certification

To reward excellence in teaching

teachers to teach in a less desirable location

teachers to teach in fields of shortage

0.80

0.51

0.34

0.57

Selected public school district characteristic

All public school districts

District size 1 school 2-3 schools 4-5 schools 6-9 schools 10-19 schools 20 or more schools

2.06 1.20 1.29 1.28 1.58 0.89

1.37 0.63 0.77 0.47 0.68 0.47

0.93 0.45 0.52 0.50 0.60 0.56

1.28 1.01 1.29 1.22 1.19 0.77

Community type City Suburban Town Rural

2.57 1.46 1.07 1.08

2.97 0.93 1.10 0.47

1.73 0.33 0.78 0.44

2.42 0.82 1.52 0.77

District K-12 enrollment Less than 250 250-999 1,000-1,999 2,000-4,999 5,000-9,999 10,000 or more

2.63 1.24 1.50 1.21 2.05 1.05

1.94 1.01 0.69 0.32 0.73 0.51

1.43 0.46 0.65 0.34 0.55 0.50

1.66 0.86 1.31 1.10 1.37 0.89

Percent of K-12 students in district who were approved for free or reduced-price lunches 0-34 35-49 50-74 75 or more District did not participate in free or reduced-price lunch program

0.92 1.21 1.19 3.87

0.67 0.96 1.26 2.12

0.17 0.49 1.03 1.66

0.70 0.90 1.55 2.40

2.76

3.75

2.16

2.65

SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Schools and Staffing Survey (SASS), "Public School District Data File," 2007-08.

Document info
Document views127
Page views127
Page last viewedTue Dec 06 20:28:23 UTC 2016
Pages59
Paragraphs2043
Words17045

Comments