X hits on this document

27 views

0 shares

0 downloads

0 comments

1 / 9

ATTORNEY FOR PETITIONER:ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT:

CRAIG R. FINLAYSONSTEVE CARTER

SWIFT & FINLAYSONATTORNEY GENERAL OF INDIANA

Fort Wayne, INIndianapolis, IN

VINCENT S. MIRKOV

DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL

Indianapolis, IN

_____________________________________________________________________

IN THE

INDIANA TAX COURT

_____________________________________________________________________

INTERSTATE WAREHOUSING, INC.,)

)

Petitioner,)

)

v.)   Cause No. 49T10-9806-TA-71

)

INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF )

STATE REVENUE,)

)

Respondent.)

______________________________________________________________________

ON APPEAL FROM A FINAL DETERMINATION

OF THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF STATE REVENUE

FOR PUBLICATION

January 9, 2002

FISHER, J.

Interstate Warehousing, Inc. (Interstate) challenges the Indiana Department of State Revenue’s (Department) denial of a refund of sales and use tax in the amount of $91,566.85 paid during the 1993 to 1996 tax years.  The Court restates Interstate’s issue for review as whether Interstate’s chilling of ammonia used to provide its customers with air conditioned storage units constitutes “direct production” of “other

Document info
Document views27
Page views27
Page last viewedThu Dec 08 04:38:50 UTC 2016
Pages9
Paragraphs61
Words2223

Comments