X hits on this document





147 / 370

140 It is too much to say that the righteous are outright enemies of the wicked. In the first instance they are

hostile toward "falsehood" (rqw-rbd), a thing rather

than a person. In the latter case, however, the righteous ("those who keep the law") actively engage in strife

(vrgty) against the wicked. This is more than an

attitude; it is a specific hostile action against other people. The relation between the righteous and wicked, however, is carefully nuanced: the wicked are enemies while the righteous sometimes behave as enemies toward the wicked.27

more frequent. If the latter option is chosen then the hrvt ybzvf would belong to the category of the fool

while the hrvt yrmvw would belong to the category of

the wise. For Proverbs, this would be a unique correlation between the wicked-fool and righteous-wise. Such a corre- lation is not to be seen in Proverbs (see Chapter 2 above).

On the other hand, if the hrvt ybzvf and the hrvt yrmvw refer to those who forsake or keep the

law of Yahweh then they belong to the categories of the wicked and righteous respectively who are continually opposed to one another. Hence, the translation "law" is here preferred.

It should perhaps be noted in this connection that this

ambiguity of the Hebrew hrvt was surely a contributing

factor in the development towards the identification between Torah and Wisdom which is seen in later wisdom such as Sirach. The Greek text translates here, not surprisingly, nomon rather than paideian.

27 Prov. 29:10, "Bloodthirsty men hate one who is blame- less, and the righteous seek his life" (MT) is textually

suspect, or, if MT is in order, then wpn wqb has come

to have the opposite of its normal meaning. Normally it signifies hostile behavior; here it would have to signify solicitous behavior. Cf. Toy, pp. 509f.; McKane, pp. 257, 637; Scott, p. 168; Oesterley, v. 261; Gemser, p. 78; Ringgren, p. 111.

Document info
Document views1372
Page views1372
Page last viewedTue Jan 24 09:47:48 UTC 2017