X hits on this document

PDF document

Guide for Completing Form 8823 - page 175 / 197





175 / 197

Egregious Noncompliance with Program Requirements

the correct amount of credit attributed to the building together with an explanation for filing of the amended forms. The state agency must send a copy of the amended Form 8609 to the owner of the building.

If the building is not issued an amended Form 8609 because all of the credit allocated to the building is returned, notification to the Internal Revenue Service is satisfied by following the requirements prescribed by Treas. Reg. 1.42-5(e)(3) for filing Form 8823.

Treas. Reg. §1.42-14(d)(2)(iv) specifies the reasons for the return of the entire amount of allocated credit:

  • 1.

    The building is not placed in service within the required time period or fails to meet the minimum set-aside requirements of IRC §42(g)(1) by the close of the first year of the credit period.

  • 2.

    The building does not comply with the terms of its credit allocation. The terms of an allocation are the written conditions agreed to by the state agency and the allocation recipient in the allocation document.

  • 3.

    The owner and state agency mutually agree to cancel an allocation of credit by mutual consent.

  • 4.

    The state agency determines, under IRC §42(m)(2), that an amount of credit allocated to a project is not necessary for the financial feasibility of the project and its viability as a qualified low-income housing project throughout the credit period.

IRS Notification

An attachment should be used to explain that the credits are being returned under the authority of Treas. Reg. 1.42-14(d)(2)(ii) and why the property did not qualify.

Owner Notification

As provided in section 1.42-14(d)(3)(i), after a state agency determines that building or project is not in compliance for the reasons 1, 2 or 4 above, the state agency must provide written notification to the allocation recipient, or its successor in interest, that all or part of the allocation is no longer valid. The notification must also state the amount of the allocation that is no longer valid. The date of the notification is the date the credit is returned by the state agency.

If an allocation is cancelled by mutual consent as noted in number 3 above, there must be a written agreement signed by the state agency and the allocation recipient, or its successor in interest, indicating the amount of the allocation that is returned to the state agency. The effective date of the agreement is the date the credit is returned to the state agency.

Egregious noncompliance is conspicuous, flagrant, and systemic in nature and includes the failure to make reasonable attempts to comply with the requirements of the program, or careless, reckless, or intentional disregard of program requirements.


Revised October 2009

Document info
Document views350
Page views350
Page last viewedMon Oct 24 16:35:42 UTC 2016