¶70 SHIRLEY majority opinion Majority op., ¶54 characterizing the use only zone" Simultaneously the
S. ABRAHAMSON, C.J. (concurring). The declares that the instant case is moot. n.23. Nevertheless the majority writes on, issue of the constitutionality of a "permit as one "of great public importance." majority opinion acknowledges that it cannot,
and does ordinance
majority opinion, to whether the
ordinance, according to the individually to determine
ordinance has a substantial relation safety, morals or general welfare.
1 ¶71 I write for three reasons: ¶72 First, I want to stress ordinance is a decision for the court.
that the wisdom of a municipality, not for
imply that the ordinance at issue is majority opinion characterizes the
struck down because the Town of Rhine's zoning
ordinance as uncommon.
The majority opinion is mistaken
of Rhine ordinance is the majority opinion
very unusual. as stating or 3
In any event, implying that
that I do only
See majority op., ¶26.
See, e.g., majority op., ¶¶39, 40, 50.
3 See Brief and Appendix of Wisconsin Counties Association at 5-8 (citing zoning ordinances similar to the Town of Rhine's from 11 municipalities and counties in Wisconsin).