X hits on this document

72 views

0 shares

0 downloads

0 comments

19 / 20

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ALLIED MEDICAL ASSOCIATES,

: :

Plaintiff,

v.

: : : :

CIVIL ACTION

NO. 08-2434

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE : COMPANY and STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY :

COMPANY, Defendants/Counterclaim-Plaintiffs,

v.

: : : : :

ALLIED MEDICAL ASSOCIATES, DAVID KIRSTEIN, D.C., and BRYAN EHRLICH, D.C., Counterclaim-Defendants.

: : :

Order

AND NOW this 16th day of April 2009, upon consideration of counterclaim-defendants’

motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 44), counterclaim-plaintiffs’ response thereto and counterclaim-

defendants’ reply, counterclaim-defendants’ motion is granted in part and denied in part, and IT

IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

  • 1.

    Counterclaim-defendants’ motion to dismiss the fraud claim in Count I, the § 4117(a) claims in Count II, and the unjust enrichment claim in Count III is DENIED to the extent that these claims are based on those reimbursement requests specifically listed in paragraphs nineteen or twenty-five or both of the counterclaim. The balance of counterclaim-plaintiffs’ counterclaim is DISMISSED without prejudice to the right to file an amended answer containing an amended counterclaim within fourteen days.

  • 2.

    Counterclaim-defendants’ motion to dismiss counterclaim-plaintiffs’ second and sixth affirmative defenses is DENIED to the extent that these claims are based on those reimbursement requests specifically listed in paragraphs nineteen or twenty-

19

Document info
Document views72
Page views74
Page last viewedSun Dec 11 05:12:51 UTC 2016
Pages20
Paragraphs418
Words5403

Comments