X hits on this document

260 views

0 shares

0 downloads

0 comments

54 / 70

________ (2001b). Nuevos tiempos, viejas manías. Gobernabilidad democrática y reformas económicas

en la Argentina,’ Revista Pensar Hacer 2/2001:81-108. ________ (2001c). ‘Gobernabilidad democrática y reformas económicas de segunda generación en

América Latina’, Revista Instituciones y Desarrollo 8-9 (2001):325-366. Schedler, A., L. Diamond, and M. Plattner, eds. (1999). The Self-Restraining State: Power and

Accountability in New Democracies (Boulder: Lynne Rienner). Schick, A. (1998). ‘Why Most Developing Countries Should Not Try New Zealand Reforms’, World Bank

Research Observer 13(1):123-31. Schmitter, P. (1999). ‘The Limits of Horizontal Accountability,’ in A. Schedler et al., The Self-Restraining

State, op.cit., 59-62. Sciolla Avendaño, G. (2003) ‘Rol de la Contraloría General de la República,’ Revista Chilena de

Administración Pública 2(5):121-131. ___________________ (2002). ‘Se debe estar atento a cualquier atisbo de corrupción,’ La Semana Jurídica

97:8-9. Siavelis, P. (2002). ‘Disconnected Fire Alarms and Ineffective Police Patrols: Legislative Oversight in

Postauthoritarian Chile,’ Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs 42(1):71-98. _________ (2000). The President and Congress in Postauthoritarian Chile (University Park: Pennsylvania

State University Press). Silvera e Silva, J.M. (2002). ‘O Réquiem do TCU,’ Correio Braziliense, 30 September. Speck, B. (2000). Inovação e Rotina no Tribunal de Contas da União (São Paulo: Fundação Konrad

Adenauer). ________ (1999). The Federal Court of Audit in Brazil, paper presented at the 9th International Anti-

Corruption Conference, Durban, South Africa, 10-15 October. Spiller, P., and M. Tommasi (2000). The Institutional Foundations of Public Policy: A Transaction

Approach with Application to Argentina (unpublished mimeo). Stapenhurst, R., and J. Titsworth (2001). Features and Functions of Supreme Audit Institutions

(Washington, DC: World Bank PREM Note 59). Stein, E., M. Tommasi, K. Echebarría, E. Lora and M. Payne, eds. (2005). The Politics of Policies:

Economic and Social Progress in Latin America (Washington, DC: IDB). Stein, E., E. Talvi and A. Grisanti (1998). Institutional Arrangements and Fiscal Performance: The Latin

American Experience (Washington, DC: IDB OCE Working Paper 367). Taliercio, R. (2004). Designing Performance: the Semi-Autonomous Revenue Authority Model in Africa

and Latin America (Washington, DC: World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3423). ________ (2003). ‘Administrative Reform as Credible Commitment: The Impact of Autonomy on Revenue

Authority Performance in Latin America,’ World Development 32(2):213-232. TCU (2003). TCU Annual Report – Fiscal Year 2002 (Brasilia: TCU). ____ (2000a). Referencial Estratégico do TCU (Brasilia: TCU). ____ (2000b). Pesquisa sobre o TCU Frente às Tendências do Control de Gestão Pública: Uma proposta

de Mudança Instituticional(Brasilia: TCU). ____ (2000c). Proceso de Exame e Julgamento de Tomada e Prestação de Contas. (Brasilia: TCU). ____ (2000d). Principais Trabalhos do Tribunal de Contas da União na Década 1990-1999 (Brasilia:

TCU). Tsebelis, G. (2002). Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work (Princeton: Princeton University Press). ________ (2000). ‘Veto Players and Institutional Analysis,’ Governance 13(4):441-474. Tsebelis, G., and E. Chang (2004). ‘Veto Players and the Structure of Budgets in Advanced Industrialized

Countries,’ European Journal of Political Research 43(3): 449-476. United Kingdom National Audit Office (2001). State Audit in the European Union (London: UK NAO). United Nations Development Programme (2004) Democracy in Latin America (New York: UNDP). Uña, G, N. Bertello and G. Cogliandro (2004) Delegación de facultades del Jefe de Gabinete de Ministros:

evolución e impacto en el contexto fiscal actual (Buenos Aires: Fundación Konrad Adenauer). Uña, G., G. Cogliandro, N. Bertello and J. Labaqui (2005) El Congreso y el Presupuesto Nacional:

Desempeño y Condicionantes de su Rol en el Proceso Presupuestario (Buenos Aires: Fundación Konrad Adenauer). Uña, G. (2004). Un enfoque alternativo para el diseño del Institutional and Governance Review (IGR): la

experiencia de Argentina, paper presented at the 9th International Congress of CLAD, Madrid, Spain, 2-5 November.

54

Document info
Document views260
Page views260
Page last viewedSun Jan 22 16:54:17 UTC 2017
Pages70
Paragraphs1267
Words36265

Comments