X hits on this document

250 views

0 shares

0 downloads

0 comments

4 / 60

POINTS AND AUTHORITIES (continued)

DAN B. DOBBS ET AL., PROSSER AND KEETON ON TORTS § 59 (5th ed. 1984).............................................................................................

RICHARD A. EPSTEIN, TORTS § 12.5, at 319-20 (1999) ....................................

Restatement (Second) of Torts § 339...............................................................

Restatement (Second) of Torts § 339, cmt. i, Reporter’s Notes ......................

Restatement (Second) of Torts § 339, cmt. j ...................................................

Restatement (Second) of Torts § 343A............................................................

B.

Defendants Are Entitled To Judgment Because There Is Overwhelming Evidence That Choate Appreciated The Dangerousness Of Jumping Onto A Moving Train............

Alop v. Edgewood Valley Cmty. Ass’n, 154 Ill. App. 3d 482 (1st Dist. 1987)

Bonney v. Canadian Nat’l Ry. Co., 800 F.2d 274 (1st Cir. 1986) ...................

Butler v. Newark Country Club, Inc., 909 A.2d 111 (Del. 2006)....................

Caponi v. Larry’s 66, 236 Ill. App. 3d 660 (2d Dist. 1992) ............................

Colls v. City of Chicago, 212 Ill. App. 3d 904 (1st Dist. 1991).......................

Dragonjac v. McGaffin Constr. & Supply Co., 186 A.2d 241 (Pa. 1962)............................................................................

Guenther ex rel. Guenther v. G. Grant Dickson & Sons, Inc.. 170 Ill. App. 3d 538 (2d Dist. 1988)..........................................................

Hagy v. McHenry County Conservation Dist., 190 Ill. App. 3d 833 (2d Dist. 1989)..........................................................

Hansen v. Ruby Constr. Co., 155 Ill. App. 3d 475 (1st Dist. 1987) ................

Herrera v. S. Pac. Ry., 10 Cal. Rptr. 575 (1961).............................................

Laster ex rel. Laster v. Norfolk S. Ry., 13 So. 3d 922 (Ala. 2009) ..................

Lazenby v. Mark’s Constr., Inc., 236 Ill. 2d 83 (2010)....................................

Long v. Manzo, 682 A.2d 370 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1996).......................................

  • -

    iii -

Page(s)

............19, 20

..................20

..................21

..................20

..................19

..................25

..................26

..................27

............28, 31

..................28

..................30

......26, 27, 31

..................28

..................27

..................26

............29, 30

..................29

..................28

..................26

..................27

Document info
Document views250
Page views250
Page last viewedTue Jan 24 09:52:54 UTC 2017
Pages60
Paragraphs1472
Words18760

Comments