X hits on this document

244 views

0 shares

0 downloads

0 comments

5 / 60

POINTS AND AUTHORITIES (continued)

Page(s)

Merrill v. Cent. Me. Power Co., 628 A.2d 1062 (Me. 1993) ............................................27

Miller v. River Hills Dev., 831 S.W.2d 756 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992).....................................27

Newby ex rel. Newby v. Lake Zurich Cmty. Unit Dist. 95, 136 Ill. App. 3d 92 (2d Dist. 1985)..............................................................................27

Nixon v. Norfolk S. Corp., 2007 WL 4190705 (W.D. Pa. Nov. 21, 2007), aff’d,

2 9 5 F . A p p x 5 2 3 ( 3 d C i r . 2 0 0 8 )

...........................................................................

3 0 , 3 1

O’Keefe v. S. End Rowing Club, 414 P.2d 830 (Cal. 1966)...............................................27

Osborne v. Claydon, 266 Ill. App. 3d 434 (4th Dist. 1994)...............................................27

Steiner Elec. Co. v. NuLine Techs., Inc., 364 Ill. App. 3d 876 (1st Dist. 2006) ...........................................................................30

Swearingen v. Korfist, 181 Ill. App. 3d 357 (2d Dist. 1989).......................................26, 28

Vega ex rel. Muniz v. Piedilato, 683 A.2d 845 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1996)...........................................................27

DAN B. DOBBS ET AL., PROSSER AND KEETON ON TORTS § 59 (5th ed. 1984)...............................................................................................................27

Restatement (Second) of Torts § 339...........................................................................27, 31

Restatement (Second) of Torts § 339, cmt. m. ..................................................................27

C.

At A Minimum, A New Trial Is Required Because The Trial Court Refused To Give A Special Jury Interrogatory On Choate’s Appreciation Of The Danger ..................................................31

735 ILCS 5/2-1108 ............................................................................................................32

Colls v. City of Chicago, 212 Ill. App. 3d 904 (1st Dist. 1991)...................................32, 33

Hagy v. McHenry County Conservation Dist., 190 Ill. App. 3d 833 (2d Dist. 1989)............................................................................32

LaSalle National Bank v. City of Chicago, 132 Ill. App. 3d 607 (1st Dist. 1985).............32

Morton v. City of Chi., 286 Ill. App. 3d 444 (1st Dist. 1997)............................................32

  • -

    iv -

Document info
Document views244
Page views244
Page last viewedMon Jan 23 15:02:09 UTC 2017
Pages60
Paragraphs1472
Words18760

Comments