X hits on this document

Word document






111 / 157

and R. Schneider, ibid., and R. Jehiel Abraham Zilber, Birur Halakha, O.H. sec. 146, no. 2, demonstrate that the contrary view of  Resp. Terumat haDeshen is predicated on a misprint (of one letter!) in the standard editions of Piskei haRosh, with the proper reading being “be-asei mi-deOraita” rather than “be-asara mi-deOraita”—as found explicitly in the Oxford-Bodley manuscript of Piskei haRosh, as well as in Tosafot haRosh and Tosafot Rabbeinu Yehuda heHasid, Berakhot 47b, s.v.Mitsvah.”

112.R. Raphael Shapira, Torat Refael, I, O.H., sec. 1; Yalkut Yosef, supra, note 111; R. Moses Feinstein, as cited in Mo’adei Yeshurun, I, Laws of Purim, 1: 6(a) and note 12 ad loc. (p. 64); R. Sha’ul Yisraeli and R. Avigdor Neventsal, as cited by R. Moses Harari, Mikra’ei Kodesh—Hilkhot Purim, sec. 1, no. 20, end of note 49 (end); Resp. Sheivet haLevi, IV, sec. 71, no. 1; R. Sraya Devlitsky, Purim Meshulash, sec. 2, note 20; Adar uFurim, sec. 3, no. 4(b)(2). Cf., however, R. Haim David Halevi, Resp Asei Lekha Rav, VII, sec. 41; R. Yehiel Abraham Zilber, supra, note 111; and Halikhot Bat Yisrael, sec. 22, no. 3.

As R. Schachter himself comments, supra, note 61 at p. 119, even if a minyan for Parshat Zakhor were biblically required, it is not at all clear that the failure to recite the attendant berakhot would, in fact, impinge upon the fulfillment of the mitsvah. First, the benedictions over the public reading of Parshat Zakhor may be of only rabbinic origin. (See the discussion found in the following sources: Peri Megadim, supra, note 83; Arukh haShulhan, O.H. sec. 47, nos. 3-4; R. Joseph Cohen, Harerei Kodesh, no. 6 on Mikra’ei Kodesh, supra, note 83; Resp. Yabia Omer, III, O.H. sec. 27, no. 11; Resp. Yehave Da’at, I, sec. 85, p. 244). Second, even if the benedictions themselves are biblically mandated, it does not necessarily follow that failure to recite them would prevent one from fulfilling a Parshat Zakhor obligation. See at length R. Abraham Dov-Ber Kahane Schapira, Resp. Devar Avraham, I, sec. 16; R. Tsvi Pesah Frank, Kunteres Mili deBrakhot, Resp. Har Zevi, O.H. II, sec. 1 (printed originally as a preface to Toledot Ze’ev, authored by his brother Ze’ev Wolf Frank); R. Isaac Arieli, Einayyim laMishpat, Berakhot 15a, s.v.ve-lo bi-vrakha.”

113.Resp. Torat Hesed, O.H. sec. 37; R. Hayyim Eleazar Shapira, Resp. Minhat Elazar, II, sec. 1, no. 4 ff.; R. Joshua Heschel Michel Shapira, Tsits haKodesh, sec. 52, no. 3; R. Dov Ber Karasik, Pit’hei Olam uMatamei haShulhan, O.H. sec. 685, no. 7, note 14; R. Solomon Schneider, Resp. Divrei Shlomo, III, sec. 340; Resp. BeTsel haHokhma, VI, sec. 49, no, 7 and at the end of the responsum; R. Meir Zev Goldberger, Resp. Imrei

Document info
Document views507
Page views508
Page last viewedThu Jan 19 00:15:38 UTC 2017