X hits on this document

34 views

0 shares

0 downloads

0 comments

13 / 15

Further, they never provided any evidence in opposition to establish the

existence of any material issues of fact. See Civ.R. 56. Also, they offered no

proof of their affirmative defenses or counterclaim. Accordingly, Deutsche Bank

was entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

{¶ 34} Appellants’ tenth, twelfth, and sixteenth assignments of error are

overruled.

Judgment affirmed.

It is ordered that appellee recover from appellants costs herein taxed.

The court finds there were reasonable grounds for this appeal.

It is ordered that a special mandate be sent to said court to carry this

judgment into execution.

A certified copy of this entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to

Rule 27 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure.

SEAN C. GALLAGHER, PRESIDING JUDGE

JAMES J. SWEENEY, J., and LARRY A. JONES, J., CONCUR

APPENDIX

{¶ 35} The assignments of error we decline to address pursuant to

App.R. 12(A)(2) include the following:

Document info
Document views34
Page views34
Page last viewedWed Dec 07 18:49:50 UTC 2016
Pages15
Paragraphs317
Words3025

Comments