object but, subjects.
not only as integration of knowledge on a assimilation of understanding among the
team, as considered examining
In a transdisciplinary written by the lawyer
dossier, one does not or by the sociologist;
perceive whether as one does not
contribution view of the
of the physicist and the one of the anthropologist; biologist and the one of the epistemologist.
a specific paragraph is distinguish between the or between the point of
As in an orchestra, everybody plays a part of the score making use of the various insights received by the colleagues and, together with them, tries to convey consonance and harmony into a symphony.
In the XVI century, Montaigne asserted that “the most universal quality is diversity”.
Transdisciplinarity confrontation and
has to mutual
be a space where transformation. It
there is room for has to be a space
diversity, for where people
respectful strive for
synergy, as much as and not to be fearml
they are willing to of their ignorance.
trust, to be As the real
comfortable issue is not
with the uncertainty, in what one knows or
does not know, but in what one assumes to know.
As well synthesised by Dr. Manderson, transdisciplinarity
has to be “the meeting
point of people and minds”. It has to be an encounter among “transformed with a “scienttjic mind’ that, as Francis Bacon remembers, is a mind
(<nimble and versatile enough to catch the resemblance of things, and at the same time steady enough tofix and discern their subtle differences; endowed by nature with the desire to seek, patience to doubt, fondness to meditate, slowness to assert, readiness to reconsider, carefulness to set in order; neither aflecting what is new, nor admiring what is old and hating every kind of impostrrre~~.