science is not easy to define. It refers to something more than
interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary contributory disciplines - between their synergy, and the resultant emergent conceptualisation, are most likely to cooperatively tackle research questions
properties of the scientific occur when a diverse mix that are embedded in large,
discourse and of scientists complex and
dynamic systems. Most scientists have made explicit research that free themselves from the tenets and reductionist science.
attempts to define approaches to processes of orthodox empirical
Upon reflection, it is easier to aspire to (and fantasise about) transdisciplinary research
than to break
actually, and knowingly,
experience it. Most
scientists find it hard enough engage in interdisciplinary
multidisciplinary honoured in the
discourse and breach as in the
research. Such contact observance (. .).
The task was to get a group of (. .) scientists (. .) to seek a common understanding, and a convergence of research methods (. .). The different groups of scientists should therefore be able to perceive the issues in more generic fashion, and learn from one another (. .).
There was a sense that disciplinary identities had partially dissolved, that a common understanding of the problem had emerged, and that we were all grappling with the same issue (. .).
research experiences are most likely to occur when there are
several persons present who have both an eclectic knowledge and a disregard
of other patterns
people’s intellectual of deference to experts
There is a
need to break Many experts
for the down have a