X hits on this document





23 / 26


1. Stacy Meza, Administration Manager. BBC, E-mail to Tina Ling, Asian Law Caucus, March 26, 2009.

2. Nails Magazine. Nationwide Survey 2008-2009. http://www. nailsmag.com/resources/industryStats.aspx?Interstitial=1 (accessed March 5, 2009)

3. Quach T, Nguyen K-D, Doan-Billings P-A, Okahara L, Fan C, Reynolds P. “A Preliminary Survey of Vietnamese Nail Salon Workers in Alameda County, California.” Community Health 33 (2008) 336- 343. DOI 10.1007/s10900-008-9107-7. (http://www.springerlink. com/content/k72566646012vl26/) (accessed March 1, 2009) [hereinafter Quach, et al., 2008], citing Federman MN, Harrington, D E,, Krynski, KJ. (2006). “Vietnamese manicurists: Are immigrants displacing natives or finding new nails to polish?” Industrial & Labor Relations Review 59, 302–318.

4. Dickson, Akeya. “Nail care industry beckons big money.” Reuters, June 20, 2004. Cited on EPA website, http://www.epa.gov/dfe/ pubs/projects/salon/milestones.htm. (accessed March 26, 2009)

5. According to one report, 278,284 or 62% of Vietnamese Californians are Limited English Proficient. Asian Pacific American Legal Center of Southern California. “California Speaks—Language Diversity and English Proficiency by Legislative District.” (http:// demographics.apalc.org/?p=5 ) (accessed Feb. 28, 2009) Feb. 2006.

6. According to another report, approximately 74% or 235,947 of the estimated 319,239 Vietnamese individuals above 15 years of age counted in the California 2000 census did not speak English “very well.” The report concluded that those individuals would probably need interpreter services in a court setting. Judicial Council of California. “2005 Language Need & Interpreter Use Study, Report to the Legislature.” (http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/ programs/equalaccess/lep.htm#langacc) (see Language Access and Reference Materials.) Feb. 2006. p.48, ex. 7.4.

7. Asian Pacific American Legal Center. “The Diverse Face of Asians and Pacific Islanders in California: Asian & Pacific Islander Demographic Profile.” (http://demographics.apalc.org/?p=4) (accessed March 1, 2009) Feb. 2006.

  • 8.

    California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 8 § 5194(g)(1).

  • 9.

    Roelofs C, Azaroff LS, Holcroft C, Nguyen H, Doan T. “Results

from a Community-based Occupational Health Survey of Vietnamese-American Nail Salon Workers.” J Immigrant Minority Health. DOI 10.1007/s10903-007-9084-4 (2007) [hereinafter Roelofs et al., 2007].

  • 10.

    California Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of

  • 1986.

    “Chemicals Known to Cause Cancer or Reproductive Toxicity.”

(Health and Safety Code §25249.5 et seq.) (http://www.oehha. ca.gov/prop65/prop65_list/files/P65single121908.pdf) (accessed February 28, 2009)

11. Cal-EPA, OEHHA, Reproductive and Cancer Hazard Assessment


Section. “Proposition 65 Maximum Allowable Dose Level (MADL) for Reproductive Toxicity for Di(n-butyl)phthalate (DBP).” (http:// www.oehha.ca.gov/prop65/law/pdf_zip/DBP%20MADL%20062907. pdf)(accessed Feb. 28, 2009)June 2007.

12. Swan S, Main KM, Liu F, Stewart SL, Kruse RL, Calafat AM, Mao CS, Redmon JB, Ternand CL, Sullivan S, Teague JL, Study for Future Families Research Team. “Decrease in Anogenital Distance among Male Infants with Prenatal Phthalate Exposure.” Environmental Health Perspectives 113.8 (August 2005)

13. European Union. “Council Directive of 27 July 1976 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to cosmetic products.” (76/768/EEC) (OJ L 262, 27.9.1976, p. 169), amended by Commission Directive 2004/93/EC of Sept. 21, 2004, L

      • 300 13 25.9.2004

        of the Official Journal.

  • 14.

    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Integrated Risk

and Information System (IRIS), Formaldehyde. (http://www.epa.gov/ NCEA/iris/subst/0419.htm) (accessed Feb. 28, 2009)

15. U.S.EPA. IRIS, Toluene. http://www.epa.gov/iris/subst/0118. htm#noncar (accessed Feb. 28, 2009)

  • 16.

    Prop. 65 List of Chemicals, supra note 10.

  • 17.

    Donald JM, Hooper K, Hopenhayn-Rich C. “Reproductive and

Developmental Toxicity of Toluene: A Review.” Environmental Health Perspectives 94 (1991): 237-244.

18. Ng TP, Foo SC, Yoong T. “Risk of spontaneous abortion in workers exposed to toluene.” Br J Ind Med 49 (1992): 804-808

19. Roelofs et al., 2007, Table 1, supra note 9; U.S. EPA. Integrated Risk and Information System, Acetone. (http://www.epa.gov/IRIS/ subst/0128.htm) (accessed Feb. 28, 2009)

20. U.S. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease. “ToxFAQs for Acetone.” (http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/tfacts21.html) (accessed February 28, 2009)

  • 21.

    Roelofs et al., 2007, Table 1, supra note 9.

  • 22.

    American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists.

  • 2001.

    Ethyl cyanoacrylate threshold limit value. Documentation

of threshold limit values and biological exposure indices, 7th ed.,

  • 2001.

    Cincinnati, OH.

  • 23.

    Asian Law Caucus and Asian Americans for Civil Rights &

Equality. “Issue Brief, Chemical Hazards in the Nail Salon Industry.” (http://www.asianlawcaucus.org) (accessed Feb. 28, 2009)

24. Massachusetts Department of Public Health’s Occupational Health Surveillance Program, Massachusetts Thoracic Society, and the Massachusetts Allergy Society. SENSOR Occupational Lung Disease Bulletin. (http://www.mass.gov/Eeohhs2/docs/dph/ occupational_health/sensor_lung_disease_bulletins/oct97.pdf) (accessed Feb. 28, 2009) October 1997; Roelofs et al., 2007, supra


Document info
Document views97
Page views97
Page last viewedSun Jan 22 01:47:33 UTC 2017