X hits on this document

Word document

Archives of an email list on the history of binoculars. - page 107 / 150

468 views

0 shares

0 downloads

0 comments

107 / 150

From: <ancohen@___t>

I greatly enjoyed the review by Holger. These are 3 of my favorite binoculars. The IOR is available commercially with full mil equipment of infrared detector/ranging grid and without either. The optical performance is slightly better sans mil fittings-a bit brighter prob due to lack of reticle. My non mil version was made later as well. According to the US importer, the coatings of IOR are licensed Zeiss Overkochen coatings, not CZJ. They also make an 8x30 Deltrentis-like glass which performs as well as its progenitor to my eye; a very heavy but optically outstanding 10x50; a lighter 10x40 and a very nice but slightly large for power 8x21 which has been mil issue in GB and that has the unusual feature of bilateral individual eye focus plus central focus! This results in great near focus making it a wonderful glass for nature hikes,etc.  The yellow tint has been discussed before but I must say that I find the 7x40 a great all day, all weather glass because if it. I am not a serious bird watcher, however, so absolute color correctness is less important.  Also, after some use you filter it out mentally and don't notice it. It clearly was Soviet issue as well and appears in fig 82 pg 158 of Dr. Seeger's second edition so labled.

The mil EDF 7x40 has a most awkward IF filter system-you have to do gymnastics with the glass to get it in and out of action, and I have found the Docter version brighter as well.

The PZO has the unique rubber armour but and seems to be a unique design as well. I have a 12x50 PZO mil issue of the same era which is a more typical variation of a CZJ design and does not enjoy the same overall quality.

Just my 2 cents. Arnie

-------

>The Rumanian IOR-SA 7x40, the East German Zeiss Jena EDF 7x40 and the Polish PZO 7x45

>   http://de.geocities.com/holger_merlitz/ior7x40.html

================================================

Subject: Nikon

There is a very good review of early Nikon marks & models, mostly binoculars in the new NHS Journal:

Richard Lane.  Nippon Kogaku Logos 1918-1945.  Nikon Historical Society NHS-82 (Dec. 31, 2003) 6-11.

http://www.nikonhs.org/nhsindex

================================================

Subject: New Zeiss Binoculars

From: Larry Gubas <lngubas@___ine.net>

A message from Wolf Wehran on some new binoculars:

  Just back from a press meeting near Toledo with 20  journalists of the shooting + outdoor press in D, A and CH. We introduced 9  new rifle scopes and 3 new binos. These binos are a real pioneering  achievement. For the first time their optical system has lenses of fluoride  glass which permit an almost perfect correction of the secondary spectrum. An  advantage which is visible. Fantastic contrast and colour rendering, no flare  and no colour fringes under any lighting conditions. They have the  designation "Victory 8x42 T* FL" for instance. FL stands for fluorite glass,  as in our spotting

scopes.    --Wolf

===============================================

Subject: 20x120 oculars

From: "Steven M. Cather" <steve@___t.edu>

  My name is Steve Cather, and I would like to join the binocular list.  I am a  professional geologist in Socorro, New Mexico, and have had a long interest in optics, in both their use and repair.  I have a question for the list members.  I recently bought a 20x120 U.S. Navy binocular at a pawn shop in Gallup, New Mexico, for quite a reasonable price.  They are, I believe, the Mark I, Mod 3 type

Document info
Document views468
Page views468
Page last viewedSat Dec 10 13:24:25 UTC 2016
Pages150
Paragraphs3634
Words73788

Comments