X hits on this document

543 views

0 shares

0 downloads

0 comments

121 / 206

Bodies, before any commitment is made, in line with paragraph 172 of the Operational Guidelines.

The World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies also regret that no further information has been received from the State Party on progress with integrated management plans for the Taj Mahal and Agra Fort, and for Fatehpur Sikri, nor has information on boundaries for all three properties been submitted, in connection with the retrospective inventory.

Draft Decision:

34 COM 7B.68

The World Heritage Committee,

  • 1.

    Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add,

  • 2.

    Recalling Decision 31 COM 7B.80, adopted at its 31st session (Christchurch, 2007),

  • 3.

    Regrets that the State Party did not submit a progress report on management and

boundaries as previously requested by the World Heritage Committee;

  • 4.

    Encourages the State Party to continue progress in the development of an integrated management plan for the Taj Mahal and the Agra Fort, and for Fatehpur Sikri, and of a Visitors Facilitation Centre, and requests that it to submit the plans when completed to the World Heritage Centre for review by the Advisory Bodies;

  • 5.

    Reiterates its requests the State Party to provide the information to the World Heritage Centre concerning the boundaries and area of the three World Heritage properties in the Agra District, as requested by the World Heritage Centre within the framework of the Retrospective Inventory project in 2006;

  • 6.

    Also requests the State Party to provide urgently detailed information, and any associated impact assessment studies that have been undertaken, on the proposed construction of a new bridge over the Yamuna River in the vicinity of the Taj Mahal, and for any other development proposals, in accordance with Paragraph 172 of the Operational Guidelines before any commitment has been made;

  • 7.

    Further requests the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre by 1 February 2011, a progress report on all of the above for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 35th session in 2011.

69.

Champaner-Pavagadh Archaeological Park (India) (C 1101)

Year of inscription on the World Heritage List 2004

Criteria (iii) (iv) (v) (vi)

Year(s) of inscription on the List of World Heritage in Danger N/A

State of conservation of World Heritage properties inscribed on the World Heritage List

WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add, p. 121

Document info
Document views543
Page views543
Page last viewedSat Dec 03 07:21:27 UTC 2016
Pages206
Paragraphs4734
Words99190

Comments