X hits on this document

61 views

0 shares

0 downloads

0 comments

1 / 14

Open Access Surgery

Dovepress

open access to scientific and medical research

Open Access Full Text Article

Review

A review on the status of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTeS) cholecystectomy: techniques and challenges

Michael C Meadows1,3 Ronald S Chamberlain1,2,3

Introduction: The evolution of techniques for the performance of a cholecystectomy over the last 25 years has been swift. The laparoscopic approach is now the gold standard for removal of the gall bladder and is the most frequently performed minimally invasive procedure globally. Currently in its infancy stage, natural orifice transluminal endoscopy surgery, or NOTES, is purported to be the next leap forward in minimally invasive approaches. The safety, feasibility, and effectiveness of this procedure, as well as the significance of potential benefits to patients beyond current surgical approaches are yet undetermined. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, a search engine created by the National Library of Medicine. Keywords used in the search included “natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery”, “NOTES”, “cholecystectomy”, “transcolonic”, “transvaginal”, and “transgastric”. The accumulated literature was critically analyzed and reviewed. Results: One-hundred and eighty-six cases of NOTES cholecystectomies have been published to date. Of these, 174 have been performed through a transvaginal approach. The remainder of the procedures were performed transgastrically. There are no published reports of transcolonic cholecystectomies performed in humans. Four of 186 cases (2.15%) were converted to traditional laparoscopy due to intraoperative complications. No significant complications or mortalities have been reported. Conclusion: NOTES cholecystectomy appears to be a feasible procedure. However, technical, safety, and ethical issues remain relatively unresolved. Besides improved cosmesis, whether additional patient benefits are likely to accrue, in comparison to traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy or single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS), is unclear. Development of instrumentation to facilitate novel NOTES techniques is in its infancy, but is critical if NOTES is to be broadly applicable. Larger human trials, the development of technological and educational platforms, and an open discussion regarding the ethical concerns are necessary if this approach is to move forward. Keywords: natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery, NOTES, cholecystectomy, transvaginal, transgastric, transrectal, transcolonic

1Department of Surgery, Saint Barnabas Medical Center, Livingston, NJ, USA; 2Department of Surgery, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Newark, NJ, USA; 3Saint George’s University, School of Medicine, west indies, Grenada

Introduction

Correspondence: Ronald S Chamberlain Saint Barnabas Medical Center, 94 Old Short Hills Rd, Livingston, New Jersey 07039, USA Tel +1 973 322 5195 Fax +1 973 322 2471 email rchamberlain@sbhcs.com

Arguably the greatest surgical advancement in the latter half of the 20th century was the rapid adoption and propagation of laparoscopic surgery. Today, laparoscopic surgery is the gold standard for a vast array of surgical procedures and has resulted in decreased hospital time, postoperative pain, surgical site infections, adhesion formation, improved cosmesis, and a simpler and more rapid return to normal life.1 Over a similar time period, flexible endoscopy has also become well established in the diagnosis and treatment of both upper and lower gastrointestinal disorders.

submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress DOI: 10.2147/OAS.S7300

73

Open Access Surgery 2010:3 73–86 © 2010 Meadows and Chamberlain, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd.This is an Open Access article `which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.

Document info
Document views61
Page views62
Page last viewedSun Dec 11 00:59:36 UTC 2016
Pages14
Paragraphs653
Words9312

Comments