X hits on this document

PDF document

$19,550,157 VERDICT – Product Liability – Asbestos Expsoure – Carpenter contracts ... - page 3 / 32





3 / 32



Founder Ira J. Zarin, Esq.


Editor in Chief Jed M. Zarin

ContributingEditors Brian M. Kessler, Esq. Michael Bagen Laine Harmon, Esq. Cristina N. Hyde Deborah McNally, Paralegal Ruth B. Neely, Paralegal Cathy Schlecter-Harvey, Esq. Julie L. Singer, Esq. Tammy A. Smith, Esq. Kate Turnbow Susan Winkler

New York County, NY

In this labor law action, a carpenter sued for a case of testicular cancer contracted after working with asbestos in the 1970s. The many commercial defendants attributed to the asbestos poisoning variously denied involvement and/or the causation of the condition.

The plaintiff in this matter, David K., was a carpenter on both the 622 Third Avenue and Olympic Towers job sites between 1974 and 1977. On those occasions several asbestos-containing joint compounds were ap- plied and sanded down in his presence, allegedly resulting in exposure to particulate matter and dust containing asbestos. The plaintiff asserted that this exposure resulted in his tunica vaginalis, a rare form of mesothe- lioma affecting the tissue surrounding the testicles.

Business Development Gary Zarin garyz@jvra.com

Production Assistant Christianne C. Mariano

Assisted Search Tim Mathieson

Court Data Coordinator Jeffrey S. Zarin

David and Ruby K. filed suit in the Supreme Court of New York, New York County for employer’s liability. The plaintiff named as the general con- tractor Tishman Liquidating Corporation (formerly Tishman Realty & Con- struction, Co., Inc.), as well as 630 Third Avenue Associates, Union Carbide, and over 20 other contractors and subcontractors allegedly a party to the plaintiff’s asbestos exposure. Non-economic and lost wages damages were sought for a violation of the New York Labor Law’s require- ment for safe workplace conditions. Settlement negotiations were confidential.

Customer Services Meredith Whelan meredithw@jvra.com

Circulation Manager Ellen Loren

At the nine week trial, the plaintiff argued that the negligent use of asbes- tos-containing joint compounds applied and sanded by defendant par- ties resulted in the exposure which caused his cancer. Expert testimony was heard from a materials expert and a forensic pathologist.

Proofreader Cathryn Peyton

Web Development & Technology

Juris Design www.jurisdesign.com

Published by Jury Verdict Review Publications, Inc. 45 Springfield Avenue, Springfield, NJ 07081 www.jvra.com

Main Office: 973/376-9002 Fax 973/376-1775

Circulation & Billing Department: 973/535-6263

The defendants presented three theories of defense, being that 1) they were not the right company, 2) the plaintiffs could not prove that there was asbestos in the joint compound, and 3) that the plaintiff’s condition was not caused by asbestos. The defendants brought Michael Sirosky, a Boston neurologist who testified that the plaintiff’s testicular mesothelioma was not caused by asbestos.

The jury deliberated for a day and a-half before returning a $19,550,157 verdict for the plaintiff, including $7 million for past pain and suffering and $12 million for future pain and suffering. The jury found Tishman Liqui- dating Corporation 76% liable for the plaintiff’s damages, with each of the three joint compound manufacturers, Kaiser Gypsum, U.S. Gypsum and Georgia Pacific, found 8% liable.

New York Jury Verdict Review & Analysis is a trademark of Jury Verdict Review Publications, Inc.

Reproduction in any form with out the expresswritten permission of the publisher is strictly prohibited by law.

New York Jury Verdict Review & Analysis (ISSN 8750-8044) is published monthly at the subscription rate of $345/year by Jury Verdict Review Publications, Inc., 45 Springfield Avenue, Springfield, NJ 07081. Periodical postage paid at Springfield, NJ and at additional mailing offices.

Postmaster: Send address changes to: New York Jury Verdict Review & Analysis, 45 Springfield Avenue, Springfield, NJ 07081.


Plaintiff’s economics expert: Lawrence Spizman from Oswego, NY. Plaintiff’s forensic pathology expert: James Strauchen from New York, NY. Plaintiff’s materials expertS: Barry Castelman from New York, NY, and Richard Hatfield from New York, NY. Plaintiff’s occupational medicine expert: Stephen Markowitz from New York, NY. Defendant’s neurology expert: Michael Sirosky from Boston, MA.

David Konstantin and Ruby Konstantin vs. 630 Third Avenue Associates, et al. Index no. 190134/2010; Judge Joan Madden, 08-17-11.

Attorneys for plaintiffs: Jordan Fox, James Long, Brian Belasky, Seth Dymond, and William Papain of Belluck & Fox in New York, NY. Attorneys for defendant: Frank Friedstedt, Esq. and Kerryann Cook, Esq. of McGivney & Kluger in New York, NY.

Subscribe Now

New York Jury Verdict Review & Analysis

Document info
Document views92
Page views92
Page last viewedTue Jan 17 18:02:36 UTC 2017