X hits on this document

52 views

0 shares

0 downloads

0 comments

3 / 23

ii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

QUESTION PRESENTED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i

TABLE OF AUTHORITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iv

STATEMENT OF THE CASE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

REASONS FOR DENYING THE WRIT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3

  • A.

    The Court of Appeals’ Analysis Is Consistent With Those Of Other Circuits And The Petition For Writ Of Certiorari Should Be Denied. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3

    • 1.

      The Ninth Circuit’s Determination That The District Court Abused Its Discretion Is Consistent With The Holdings Of Every Other Circuit. . . . . . . . . 4

    • 2.

      In Balancing The Gilbert Factors, The Ninth Circuit Accorded Proper Weight To The Access To Evidence For Both Parties, Among The Other Relevant Factors. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6

  • B.

    The Ninth Circuit Followed Well Established Law In Evaluating The Relevance of Witness Testimony And Did Not Create Any Public Policy Concerns. . . . . . . . 8

1.

The Courts Have Established A Flexible Standard In Applying The Gilbert Factors, Which Was Followed

Document info
Document views52
Page views52
Page last viewedFri Dec 09 00:25:16 UTC 2016
Pages23
Paragraphs256
Words5909

Comments